JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)April 25, 1995

A- de 1995

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Teresa Rivera Ballesteros

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Resolución
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Se declaró que la Sala de Casación Laboral de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, en su calidad de superior jerárquico, es competente para decidir sobre el conflicto de competencia de orden territorial, surgido entre dos Juzgados Laborales del Circuito.

Por esta razón, la Corte decidió ordenar el envío del expediente a la mencionada Sala para que defina el conflicto de competencia entre los juzgados de la referencia.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. Primero. DECLARAR que la Sala de Casación Laboral de la H. Corte Suprema de Justicia, en su calidad de superior jerárquico común, es competente para decidir sobre el conflicto de competencia de orden territorial, surgido entre el Juzgado
  2. Segundo. Laboral del Circuito de Itagüí y el Juzgado Doce Laboral del Circuito de Santa Fe de Bogotá.
  3. Segundo. ORDENAR el envío del expediente a la Sala de Casación Laboral de la H. Corte Suprema de Justicia, para que defina el conflicto de competencia entre los juzgados
  4. Segundo. del Circuito de Itagüí y Doce del Circuto de Santa Fe de Bogotá.
  5. Notifíquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
José Gregorio Hernández Galindo
Reporting justice
✓
Alejandro Martínez Caballero
Magistrado
✓
Antonio Barrera Carbonell
Magistrado
✓
Carlos Gaviria Díaz
Magistrado
✓
Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz
Magistrado
✓
Fabio Morón Díaz
Magistrado
✓
Hernando Herrera Vergara
Magistrado
✓
Jorge Arango Mejía
Magistrado
✓
Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa
Magistrado
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.